Puma Deviate Nitro 2 vs Asics Novablast 3: Which Running Shoe is the Right Fit for You?
Finding the perfect running shoe can make all the difference for both competitive runners and casual joggers. Two popular models currently making waves are the Puma Deviate Nitro 2 vs Asics Novablast 3. Both shoes offer unique features that appeal to different running needs – whether it’s speed, comfort, or durability. In this combined review, we’ll provide a simple yet detailed comparison to help you decide which shoe suits you best.
Overview:
Puma Deviate Nitro 2
The Puma Deviate Nitro 2 is crafted for those who focus on performance and speed. It integrates Puma’s advanced Nitro foam midsole, which offers excellent energy return and cushioning, making it a go-to choice for competitive runs and tempo training. The addition of a carbon plate (INNOPLATE) boosts propulsion, helping runners push themselves further and faster.
Asics Novablast 3
In contrast, the Asics Novablast 3 focuses on comfort and cushioning, perfect for longer, more relaxed runs or recovery days. The FlyteFoam Blast+ midsole provides a soft, bouncy ride with exceptional shock absorption. It appeals to runners looking for an effortless, cushioned experience over everyday miles.
Key Features Comparison:
| Feature | Puma Deviate Nitro 2 | Asics Novablast 3 |
|---|---|---|
 |  | |
| Midsole Technology | Nitro Foam | FlyteFoam Blast+ |
| Energy Return | High (with INNOPLATE) | Moderate |
| Stability | Carbon plate enhances stability | Heel stabilizer for smoother strides |
| Weight | Lightweight | Slightly heavier |
| Upper Material | Engineered mesh | Jacquard mesh |
| Outsole | PUMAGRIP rubber | AHAR Plus rubber |
| Durability | High durability | Robust build |
| Best Use | Tempo runs, intervals, races | Daily training, long runs, recovery jogs |
| Price | Check on Amazon | Check on Amazon |
Performance and Running Experience:
Speed and Energy Return
- Puma Deviate Nitro 2: With the Nitro Foam midsole and INNOPLATE carbon plate, this shoe is designed for speed-focused runners. It ensures high energy return, propelling runners forward efficiently during races or interval training.
- Asics Novablast 3: While still offering good energy return, the FlyteFoam Blast+ midsole prioritizes a bouncier, cushioned ride over raw speed. This makes it more suitable for runners who value comfort on slower or recovery runs.
Winner: For speed and propulsion, Puma Deviate Nitro 2 takes the lead.
Comfort and Fit
- Puma Deviate Nitro 2: The engineered mesh upper provides a snug and secure fit, reducing foot movement during high-speed runs. It also features a lightweight design, enhancing agility.
- Asics Novablast 3: Designed with a plusher midsole and roomier fit, the Novablast 3 offers unmatched comfort, especially for those with wider feet or during longer runs.
Winner: If plush comfort is a priority, Asics Novablast 3 is the better choice.
Stability
- Puma Deviate Nitro 2: The built-in carbon plate provides excellent stability for faster runs. This structure makes it ideal for runners who need support during intervals or tempo sessions.
- Asics Novablast 3: While it offers a heel stabilizer to promote smoother strides, it lacks the same level of stability for high-speed efforts.
Winner: For stability in performance-focused runs, Puma Deviate Nitro 2 excels.
Weight and Design:
- Puma Deviate Nitro 2: Lightweight and performance-oriented, ideal for those looking for a nimble shoe. The sleek design offers a modern look that appeals to runners focused on performance and aesthetics.
- Asics Novablast 3: While slightly heavier, this model delivers in the style department with its sporty and vibrant design. It offers more color options and suits runners who want both comfort and aesthetics.
Winner: For runners seeking lightweight shoes, Puma Deviate Nitro 2 is the better option. But if style and color variety are important, Asics Novablast 3 stands out.
Durability and Traction:
- Puma Deviate Nitro 2: Features a PUMAGRIP rubber outsole, offering excellent traction on various surfaces, including wet roads. This outsole ensures long-lasting performance even after many miles.
- Asics Novablast 3: Built with AHAR Plus rubber, the Novablast 3’s outsole offers durability and solid grip for everyday runs on diverse terrains.
Winner: Both models are highly durable, but the PUMAGRIP outsole gives Puma a slight edge in traction and longevity.
Price Comparison:
Both models fall within a similar price range, but Puma Deviate Nitro 2 is typically priced slightly higher, reflecting its performance-focused features. In contrast, the Asics Novablast 3 offers a more affordable option without compromising on comfort and quality.
User Feedback:
- Puma Deviate Nitro 2: Users appreciate its speed, stability, and traction. It’s particularly praised for how well it performs during competitive races and intense training sessions.
- Asics Novablast 3: Wearers highlight its comfort and cushioning, making it a favorite for everyday training and long runs. The plush feel has earned it high marks from those who prioritize foot comfort.
Conclusion: Which Shoe Should You Choose?
Choosing between the Puma Deviate Nitro 2 and Asics Novablast 3 depends on what you value most in your running experience:
- Choose Puma Deviate Nitro 2 if you’re focused on performance, speed, and stability. This shoe is perfect for tempo runs, interval training, and races.
- Choose Asics Novablast 3 if you prioritize comfort, cushioning, and a smoother ride. It’s an excellent choice for daily runs, long-distance jogging, or recovery days.
Both shoes are exceptional options, catering to different types of runners. Whether you aim to push your limits or simply enjoy a comfortable, cushioned run, either choice will be a valuable addition to your running shoe rotation.
